Asus RTX 4090 ROG Strix OC Review: Truly Massive
of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 It launched last week and set a new bar height for clearing the competition. With the RTX 4090 on top, GPU Benchmark Hierarchy Ranked as fastest best graphics card, the problem remains that you need to buy a specific 4090 model. In addition to the Founders Edition, cards from a number of third-party Add-in Board (AIB) partners are in the works.Start a third party review Asus RTX 4090 ROG Strix OC (opens in new tab)is an absolutely massive card that overwhelms the already chunky 4090 Founders Edition.
The short answer to which card to buy is “any RTX 4090 in stock”. Despite extreme pricing, the performance boost was large enough that all 4090 cards sold out on launch.Certainly part of it can be attributed to RTX 4090 ScalperHowever No cryptocurrency GPU mining — No, the RTX 4090 is not profitable for mining. Also, I don’t have any other GPUs so far.
That, of course, depends on whether Nvidia can supply enough RTX 4090 GPUs to the market.I know the cards are sold out, but I don’t know how many actually soldThe number is in the thousands, and in some cases tens of thousands. However, Halo GPU launches don’t usually come with a lot of supply. Still, the RTX 4090 is incredibly fast, and Nvidia probably isn’t in a rush to push other of his 40-series models out. Independently endorsed by Nvidia (opens in new tab) We anticipate an oversupply situation at least through the end of the year.
However, Nvidia cannot delay forever. AMD announces RDNA 3 on November 3rdWe fully expect AMD to offer a card (possibly the Radeon RX 7900 XT) at a much lower price point than the RTX 4090. The RX 7950 XT, RX 7900 XT and RX 7800 XT. More details will be revealed in the coming weeks.
We’ve currently tested three different RTX 4090 cards: the Founders Edition, this Asus ROG Strix, and (to be reviewed) the MSI Suprim Liquid X. This review will show the results of all three cards, but knowledgeable gamers would know that. Performance rarely varies significantly between cards that use the same core GPU. Aesthetics and other factors become more important. Click here for 3 types of specs
graphics card | Asus RTX 4090 ROG Strix OC | MSI RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid X | RTX 4090 Founders Edition |
---|---|---|---|
architecture | AD102 | AD102 | AD102 |
SMS | 128 | 128 | 128 |
GPU shader | 16384 | 16384 | 16384 |
Boost Clock (MHz) | 2610 (gaming), 2640 (OC mode) | 2625 | 2520 |
VRAM Speed (Gbps) | twenty one | twenty one | twenty one |
VRAM (GB) | twenty four | twenty four | twenty four |
TFLOPS FP32 (Boost) | 85.5 | 86 | 82.6 |
TFLOPS FP16 (FP8) | 684 (1368) | 688 (1376) | 661 (1321) |
Bandwidth (GBps) | 1008 | 1008 | 1008 |
TDP (Watts) | 450 | 480 | 450 |
Release date | October 2022 | October 2022 | October 2022 |
launch price | $1,999 | $1,749 | $1,599 |
All three cards have the same underlying hardware, so I’ve removed most of the redundant lines from the specs list above. The only real difference in specs is due to potential differences in boost clocks and power ratings.
Asus doesn’t specify a TBP, but it’s supposed to be 450W, the same as the Founders Edition. With Asus GPU Tweak installed, you can also choose an OC mode that applies an extra 30 MHz to your GPU core clock and raises your power limit by a few percent. We’ll skip that and explore manual overclocking instead.
On paper, the Asus card has a factory overclock of 3.6% and the MSI card has a factory overclock of 4.2%. In reality, the GPU clocks we measured during testing are much closer than that. The Founders Edition averaged 2738 MHz in the Metro Exodus test, the MSI card at 2783 MHz (1.6% higher) and the Asus card at 2791 MHz (1.9% higher). As usual, Nvidia’s real-world GPU clocks tend to easily top their spec sheets.
Read more about how the RTX 4090 works here Nvidia Ada Lovelace Architecture DetailsWe also ran quite a few additional tests on the RTX 4090 Founders Edition, including professional content creation workloads and DLSS 3 tests. Our review of AIB cards will focus on card design and aesthetics, as well as other additional features, as the differences we see in performance are relatively limited.
Asus RTX 4090 ROG Strix OC: Teardown and Overclock
The Asus RTX 4090 ROG Strix unboxing video above gives a good overview of what you get with this card. It’s significantly longer, taller, thicker and heavier than Nvidia’s RTX 4090 Founders Edition, which measures 304 x 137 x 61 mm and weighs 2186 g.
compared to the previous generation RTX 3090 ROG Strix (opens in new tab), things have changed significantly. The 4090 card is very boxy with no truncated corners. There isn’t much RGB lighting either, or at least it’s different than the previous 30-series Strix cards.The edge of the card (opposite the video port) has a rectangular plastic cover with the RGB “Republic of Gamers” logo on it. I have. That’s all.
The new ROG Strix chassis definitely embraces the idea of ’making it big’ for graphics cards. It is 3.5 slots wide and effectively occupies 4 slots. Oddly enough, Asus has opted for a dual-slot IO bracket. Covering the extra slots might support the card a bit more and provide more exhaust ports, so I’m not sure why.
Despite the cutout, the card doesn’t actually expel much air from the IO bracket. The heatsink fins are positioned parallel to his IO bracket, so most of the airflow exits the top and bottom of the card and back into the case. This is the traditional approach to cooling and should work well, but we don’t recommend putting the ROG Strix in a small case, it just won’t fit.
Asus included three 104mm axial fans on the card, all with built-in rims to direct airflow over the heatsink fins and improve static pressure. This is a slightly larger fan size than his 97mm fan on the previous generation 30-series Strix card, and the new fan is also slightly thicker (deeper). As we’ve seen on other recent Asus cards, the center fan spins clockwise and the outer fan spins counterclockwise. This reduces air turbulence and fan noise.
Asus also includes dual HDMI 2.1 ports in addition to the traditional triple DisplayPort outputs, but only four can be active at any given time. As mentioned in his 4090 review on the main the DP port still uses the old 1.4a standard — yes this is the same port standard that first appeared on his GTX 10 series back in 2016 is. Why not DisplayPort 2.0? Apparently it wasn’t ready in time, or at least that’s what Nvidia claimed when asked during the briefing. Considering it’s finished, that’s unlikely. VESA Announces DisplayPort 2.1 SpecificationAMD’s RDNA 3 is rumored to support – no surprise as it is fully backwards compatible with DP 2.0.