Gaming PC

AMD Shares First Official Ryzen 7 7800X3D Gaming Benchmarks vs Core i9-13900K, Up To 24% Faster

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

AMD finally made its own with the long-awaited $449 Ryzen 7 7800X3D taking on Intel’s flagship $589 Core i9-13900K, winning 20% ​​average and up to 24% in a single title. We’ve finally shared the official gaming benchmarks.The new benchmarks also offer a limited comparison between the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. This means that cheap chips offer roughly the same level of gaming performance as expensive flagships.

AMD Has Already Released Its $699 Flagship Ryzen 9 7950X3D With 3D V-Cache To Critical Acclaim, And The New Chip Takes The Crown As The Best CPU For Gaming, Dominating The CPU Benchmark Tiers maintains a strong presence. The company also modestly launched the $599 Ryzen 9 7900X3D without a sampling press (you can see the review at the link).

However, AMD is stingy with its benchmarks, with its $449 8-core Ryzen 7 7800X3D chip waiting until April to launch, only comparing it to the previous-gen Ryzen 7 5800X3D in gaming, a perfectly relevant Core I haven’t compared it to the i9. 13900K and Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

That may be because the 7800X3D is too good for its own good.According to an AMD rep, the 78000X3D provides the majority of gaming performance from 3D V-Cache, but other Much more affordable than the X3D model. So, naturally, if the 7800X3D offers about the same level of gaming performance at $250 less than the flagship, there’s not much reason to buy the pricier model once the 7800X3D arrives.

We’ll have to see if things hold out in our own benchmark tests, but it looks like the Ryzen 7 7800X3D will steal the performance crown from Intel’s Raptor Lake when it comes out next month. I am certainly painting that picture.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Take these benchmarks into consideration as well as any benchmarks provided by the vendor. (I’ve included the test notes below in the test setup details, but the ‘5’ footnote doesn’t mention the 13900K details, they’re in the ‘2’ footnote).

Related Articles

Back to top button