Gaming PC

Nvidia’s RTX 6000 Ada Tested in 3DMark: AD102 with 18,176 Cores

On paper, Nvidia’s RTX 6000 Ada professional graphics card has more compute power than its GeForce RTX 4090 flagship board for gamers. Still, when I tested it on the 3DMark TimeSpy Graphics benchmark, it didn’t really beat me. reddit Post noticed by @harukaze5719.

Nvidia’s RTX 6000 Ada 48GB graphics board is based on the AD102 GPU with 18,176 CUDA cores enabled. Nvidia and its partners haven’t specified clocks for his GPU, but have revealed that the card has a peak computing performance of 91.1 FP32 TFLOPS (which suggests a clock of around 2,505 MHz). . In contrast, Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 4090 24GB runs at up to 2,520 MHz and uses an AD102 GPU with 16,3840 CUDA cores rated up to 82.575 FP32 TFLOPS.

There is one big difference between the two cards (although they appear to use the same PCB). Gaming cards can consume up to 450W of power, while professional cards can consume up to 300W of total board power. It can run much longer and at higher clocks than the former. While this limits performance, it extends the lifespan of the RTX 6000 Ada and GeForce RTX 4090.

(Image credit: Healthy-Blood-54/Reddit)

This is exactly the performance of the two cards on the 3DMark Time Spy Graphics benchmark. The RTX 6000 Ada’s graphics score was 30,158 points in the latest Windows update (see screenshot), but before the update he may have been 36,844 points, according to the individual who posted the score. Healthy Blood-54On the other hand, the GeForce RTX 4090 scores easily 40,964 point.

Related Articles

Back to top button