Raptor Lake Non-K CPUs Reportedly Up to 64 Percent Faster Than Alder Lake Counterparts

There are rumors in the streets that Intel will launch the 13th generation. raptor lake Non-K processors at CES 2023.hardware leaker chi11eddog We are sharing some performance numbers for the upcoming chips. The tipster claims that the motherboard vendor has conducted tests for analysis. However, we advise you to approach the information with caution.
Intel’s Raptor Lake K series, etc. Core i9-13900K Also Core i7-13700K, best CPU at the market. Not everyone needs a ton of firepower, though, and that’s where non-K-series products come in. They retain the essence of the K-series, which is core count. However, the chip features slightly slower clock speeds to comply with his 65W TDP.
The leak gives us a sneak peek at the performance of the Core i9-13900, Core i7-13700, Core i5-13600, Core i5-13500 and Core i5-13400. According to chi11eddog, an anonymous motherboard manufacturer tested the processors on the same motherboard with the same memory, so the results are directly comparable between his two generations of Intel chips.However, the leaker wondered if the vendor was using his DDR4 or DDR5 memory. The vendor only used a benchmark (Cinebench R23) to evaluate the chip, so the results only show the performance of the processor with that particular software.
processor | raptor lake | alder lake | Performance difference |
---|---|---|---|
Core i9-13900 / Core i9-12900 | 2,191 | 1,986 | Ten% |
Core i7-13700 / Core i7-12700 | 2,027 | 1,901 | 6% |
Core i5-13600 / Core i5-12600 | 1,948 people | 1,869 | Four% |
Core i5-13500 / Core i5-12500 | 1,866 | 1,808 | 3% |
Core i5-13400 / Core i5-12400 | 1,798 | 1,698 | 6% |
The results seem to indicate that single-core performance is not significantly improved. The Core i7-13700 and Core i5-13400 also showed 6% higher single-core performance than the Core i7-12700 and Core i5-12700. core i5-12400, Respectively. The rest of Raptor Lake’s non-K chips offered less than 5% single-core upgrade over their Alder Lake counterparts.
processor | raptor lake | alder lake | Performance difference |
---|---|---|---|
Core i9-13900 / Core i9-12900 | 38,496 | 25,001 | 53% |
Core i7-13700 / Core i7-12700 | 29,327 | 21,896 | 34% |
Core i5-13600 / Core i5-12600 | 22,117 | 13,869 | 59% |
Core i5-13500 / Core i5-12500 | 21,134 | 12,861 | 64% |
Core i5-13400 / Core i5-12400 | 16,288 | 12,638 | 28% |
Raptor Lake’s multi-core performance comes from adding more E-cores. Raptor Lake features double the amount of E-cores compared to Alder Lake. The additional E-cores significantly increased the multi-core count of Raptor Lake. The Core i5-13500 is a whopping 64% upgrade over the Core i5-12500. The Core i5-13600 is another example where the chip delivers 59% better multi-core performance than the Core i5-12500. Finally, the Core i5-13400, which showed the lowest improvement, was 28% faster than its predecessor.
Intel’s Raptor Lake non-K processors face stiff competition from AMD’s Raizen 7000 army next year.Additionally, Intel is pocket-friendly B760 A chipset that allows budget-conscious consumers to combine non-K chips with inexpensive motherboards.AMD, on the other hand, is probably already preparing a branded non-X Raizen 7000 SKUs like the Ryzen 9 7900, Ryzen 7 7700, or Ryzen 5 7600 fight back against Intel’s Raptor Lake non-K army. We’ll see how the two face off early next year.