The Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Libel Case Is in the Jury’s Hands

“The ruling on amber here sends the message that no matter what you do, as a victim of abuse, you always have to do more,” Lottenborn said. “No matter what you document, you always have to document more. No matter who you say, you always have to talk to more people.”

The publication at the heart of Mr. Depp’s complaint is Mr. Haad’s editorial, led and produced by the American Civil Liberties Union. Mr Haad did not nominate Mr Depp in the article, but he claimed that it clearly hinted at their relationship, undermined his reputation and “destroyed” his acting career.

The jury is also responsible for determining whether Mr. Depp has defamed Mr. Hard when a lawyer representing Mr. Depp issued a statement in 2020 calling for damage to the credibility of her allegations of abuse. I have. They called the police to the couple’s house. (Before the call, Mr. Hard testified, Mr. Depp threw a call at her at close range, and Mr. Depp struck her with her denied face.)

Mr. Haad’s proceedings alleged that Mr. Depp, through these statements, “launched a national campaign” to damage her credibility. She testified that she had not seen the statement in question until the proceedings were filed.

In a previous trial in London, judges discovered that Mr. Depp had repeatedly attacked Mr. Hard through their relationship. The 2020 proceedings in the United Kingdom called Depp a “wife” to NewsGroup Newspapers, the publisher of the British tabloid The Sun, and Dan Wootton, the editor-in-chief of the newspaper. It revolved around the proceedings filed under the headline. Beater. “

The jury trial verdict in this case must be unanimous, but the panel does not need to find compelling evidence “beyond reasonable doubt” as in criminal cases. Each party is responsible for proving that the evidence of defamation is heavy and that there is clear and compelling evidence that the other party acted in real malicious intent during the defamation.